🆚 QQ vs. Zalo
- 📈 Zalo is noticeably more popular than QQ.
- 🌍 Zalo is more popular in Vietnam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Singapore.
- 🌍 QQ is more popular in China, Hong Kong, and Cambodia.
QQ
ZaloType
About
Tencent QQ is a Chinese instant messaging software platform.
It supports text, voice, and video chat, file transfers, and group messaging, allows users to create customizable avatars, integrates social networking features through QQ Zone, and includes additional services such as games, music, and online shopping.
Zalo is a Vietnamese mobile instant messenger and social media service.
It provides text messaging with images, voice and video calls, status posts, and file sharing, friend discovery by phone number or QR code, reminders and group chats, and integrates mobile payments via ZaloPay and business tools like Official Accounts and Mini Apps.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in China in the Instant Messaging category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in China in the Social Media category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Hong Kong in the Instant Messaging category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Hong Kong in the Social Media category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Vietnam in the Instant Messaging category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the U.S. Virgin Islands in the Instant Messaging category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Singapore in the Instant Messaging category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Tencent company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,001,723 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.