🆚 QUIC.cloud vs. WPMU CDN
- 📈 WPMU CDN is five times more popular than QUIC.cloud.
- 🌎 WPMU CDN is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia.
- 🌍 QUIC.cloud is more popular in Turkey, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Ukraine.
QUIC.cloud
WPMU CDNType
About
QUIC.cloud is a content delivery network and online service platform for 
WordPress developed by the team at 
LiteSpeed Technologies that provides HTTP/3 support, static and dynamic caching, and security features.
It operates as a reverse proxy across 70+ global points of presence, includes brute-force mitigation and DDoS protection, offers image and 
CSS optimization, and works exclusively with the LiteSpeed Cache for WordPress plugin.
WPMU CDN is a content delivery network for WordPress sites with 123 Points of Presence (POPs) and 150 Tbps+ network capacity.
Headquarters
Pricing
(78 CDN nodes)
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Turkey in the Image Optimization category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Poland in the Image Optimization category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the United States in the Image Optimization category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Australia in the Image Optimization category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Image Optimization category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in South Africa in the CDN category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Ireland in the CDN category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Canada in the CDN category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in the United States in the CDN category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Australia in the CDN category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,976,354 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.