🆚 RawGit vs. Statically
- 📈 RawGit is much more popular than Statically.
- 🌎 RawGit is more popular in the United States, Japan, and Korea.
- 🌍 Statically is more popular in South Africa and Egypt.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Public CDN
Public CDN
About
RawGit is a public CDN for serving files from raw.githubusercontent.com with the correct content types.
GitHub
GitLabHeadquarters
Portland, Oregon, United States
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Pricing
Free ✔️
Free ✔️
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The RawGit public CDN is 9 times more popular than Statically.
Total websites
Market share
Public CDN
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
RawGit is more popular in the United States, Japan, and Korea, while Statically is more popular in South Africa and Egypt.
United States
Japan
Korea
United Kingdom
India
Germany
Indonesia
France
Brazil
Australia
Awards
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Japan in the Public CDN category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Korea in the Public CDN category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Vietnam in the Public CDN category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Brazil in the Public CDN category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Indonesia in the Public CDN category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Indonesia in the Public CDN category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Public CDN category.
- 🔥 16th most popular in the United States in the Public CDN category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
RawGit is more popular than Statically in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Travel
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Cdnjs
Google Hosted Libraries
jsDelivr
Githack🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,361,290 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.