🆚 Redis Object Cache vs. Swift Performance
- 📈 Redis Object Cache is much more popular than Swift Performance.
- 🌍 Redis Object Cache is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Redis Object CacheType
Caching solution
Caching solution
About
Redis Object Cache is a persistent object cache backend for 
WordPress that stores database query results in memory to reduce server load.
It supports multiple 
PHP clients including Predis, PhpRedis, and Relay, and offers advanced replication, sentinel, sharding, and clustering setups with WP-CLI commands for cache management.
Swift Performance is a WordPress caching plugin that includes page caching, 
CSS and 
JavaScript optimization, DB optimizer and plugin organizer.
Headquarters
Nelson, British Columbia, Canada
Ujlengyel, Pest, Hungary
Pricing
Free version ✔️ Open source
Pro $95/month
Enterprise $23,400+/year
Free version ✔️ Lite, open source
$49.99/year
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Redis Object Cache caching solution is 62 times more popular than Swift Performance.
Total websites
Market share
Caching
WordPress Plugins
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Redis Object Cache is more popular than Swift Performance in all countries.
United States
France
United Kingdom
Germany
Netherlands
Italy
Brazil
Spain
Canada
Greece
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Korea in the Caching category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Greece in the Caching category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Vietnam in the Caching category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in China in the Caching category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Thailand in the Caching category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Redis Object Cache is more popular than Swift Performance in all market segments.
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Marketing/Merchandising
General News
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Internet Services
Travel
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.