🆚 Render vs. Supabase
- 📈 Supabase is noticeably more popular than Render.
- 🌎 Supabase is more popular in the United Kingdom, Brazil, and France.
- 🌎 Render is more popular in the United States, New Zealand, and Finland.
Type
About
Render is a unified cloud platform for building and running applications and websites with a global CDN, private networks, and automatic deployments from
Git.
It provides managed services including Web Services, Static Sites, and Background Workers, fully managed PostgreSQL databases, key-value Redis-compatible instances, and edge caching.
Supabase is an open-source backend-as-a-service platform based on PostgreSQL.
It provides a hosted Postgres database with RESTful and GraphQL APIs, built-in authentication, secure file storage, support for edge functions written in
TypeScript with global deployment, role-based access control, and row-level security.
Headquarters
Pricing
(8 GB per project, 100K MAU) $25+/month
(+ SSO) $599+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United States in the Deployment Platforms category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Germany in the Deployment Platforms category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in France in the Deployment Platforms category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in the United States in the Cloud Services category.
- 🔥 17th most popular in Australia in the Cloud Services category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Sweden in the Authentication category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Authentication category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Brazil in the Authentication category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in France in the Authentication category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in China in the Authentication category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,816,780 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

