🆚 RSD vs. XFN
- 📈 RSD is noticeably more popular than XFN.
- 🌎 RSD is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 XFN is more popular in DPR Korea.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Standard
Standard
About
Really Simple Discovery (RSD) is an XML format that helps client software find the services needed to read, edit, or "work with" weblogging software.
XHTML Friends Network (XFN) is an HTML microformat that provides a simple way to represent human relationships using links.
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
RSD is 1.6 times more popular than XFN.
Total websites
Market share
Standards
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
RSD is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom, while XFN is more popular in DPR Korea.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Spain
Italy
France
Japan
Australia
Netherlands
Brazil
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in El Salvador in the Standards category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Bhutan in the Standards category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Libya in the Standards category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Spain in the Standards category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Italy in the Standards category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Bhutan in the Standards category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Sierra Leone in the Standards category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Iran in the Standards category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Nigeria in the Standards category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Kenya in the Standards category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
RSD is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and blogs and wiki, while XFN is more commonly used on real estate sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Travel
Health
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

