🆚 RDF vs. XFN
- 📈 XFN is much more popular than RDF.
- 🌍 XFN is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Standard
Standard
About
Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a W3C standard model to describe and exchange graph data on the web.
XHTML Friends Network (XFN) is an HTML microformat that provides a simple way to represent human relationships using links.
Headquarters
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
XFN is 135 times more popular than RDF.
Total websites
Market share
Standards
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
XFN is more popular than RDF in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
France
Spain
Italy
Netherlands
Australia
Brazil
India
Awards
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in Ukraine in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in Pakistan in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 24th most popular in Russia in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 25th most popular in Indonesia in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 25th most popular in South Africa in the Standards category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Bhutan in the Standards category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Sierra Leone in the Standards category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Iran in the Standards category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Nigeria in the Standards category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Kenya in the Standards category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
XFN is more popular than RDF in all market segments.
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Travel
Health
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.