🆚 Sapper vs. SvelteKit

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Backend framework
Backend framework

About

Sapper is an open-source Svelte framework for server-rendered and client-hydrated web applications that has been deprecated in favor of its successor, SvelteKit.

It supports file-based routing with server routes and pages, both Rollup and Webpack templates, legacy browser builds, and TypeScript.

SvelteKit is a framework for rapidly developing robust, performant web applications using Svelte.

It offers server-side rendering, file-based routing, API routes, automatic code splitting, and direct integration with Svelte components.

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Backend Frameworks › Rank #39
Backend Frameworks › Rank #19
Legacy › Rank #83

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The SvelteKit backend framework is 20 times more popular than Sapper.
Total websites

Market share

Backend Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

SvelteKit is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Sweden, while Sapper is more popular in Romania, Cyprus, and Luxembourg.
United States
Germany
Sweden
France
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Canada
Switzerland
Belgium
Japan

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

SvelteKit is more popular than Sapper in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Entertainment
Games
Education/Reference
Travel
Online Shopping
Software/Hardware
Finance/Banking

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#32,007
#49,629
#56,344
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#1,130
#1,373
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.