🆚 Setupad vs. ValueImpression
- 📈 Setupad is noticeably more popular than ValueImpression.
- 🌍 Setupad is more popular in Lithuania, Latvia, and Spain.
- 🌎 ValueImpression is more popular in the United States, Germany, and India.
Statistics based on 3.6M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Advertising technology
Advertising technology
About
Setupad is ad optimization platform that helps publishers increase advertising revenue by optimizing programmatic demand.
It offers hybrid header bidding with both client-side and server-side Prebid integrations, supports 
Google Ad Manager and 
AdSense setups, and provides access to more than 30 premium supply-side platforms, including Google Open Bidding and Amazon Transparent Ad Marketplace.
ValueImpression is a Header Bidding ad network from Asia.
Headquarters
Riga, Latvia
Hanoi, Vietnam
Categories
Advertising › Rank #121
Advertising › Rank #146
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Setupad advertising technology is 1.8 times more popular than ValueImpression.
Total websites
Market share
Advertising
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Setupad is more popular in Lithuania, Latvia, and Spain, while ValueImpression is more popular in the United States, Germany, and India.
Lithuania
United States
Latvia
Germany
India
Spain
United Kingdom
Poland
Estonia
Netherlands
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Setupad is more popular among sites focused on general news, entertainment, and games, while ValueImpression is more commonly used on blogs and wiki, Internet services, and potential illegal software sites.
Blogs/Wiki
General News
Entertainment
Games
Business
Public Information
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Marketing/Merchandising
Technical/Business Forums
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Ezoic
Freestar
Criteo
Taboola🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.