🆚 Sezzle vs. Zip
- 📈 Zip is slightly more popular than Sezzle.
- 🌍 Zip is more popular in Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌎 Sezzle is more popular in the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Payment service
Payment service
About
Sezzle is a payment processing platform that enables shoppers to "Buy Now, Pay Later" with interest-free installment plans.
Zip is a "buy now, pay later" payment service that operates in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States.
Headquarters
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Sydney, Australia
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Zip payment service is 1.2 times more popular than Sezzle.
Total websites
Market share
Payments
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Zip is more popular in Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, while Sezzle is more popular in the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands.
Australia
United States
Canada
New Zealand
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Singapore
Hong Kong
Spain
France
Awards
- 🔥 14th most popular in Canada in the Payments category.
- ⬆️ 24th most popular in the United States in the Payments category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Australia in the Payments category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in New Zealand in the Payments category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Zip is more popular among sites focused on online shopping, marketing and merchandising, and fashion and beauty, while Sezzle is more commonly used on weapons, health, and tobacco sites.
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Fashion/Beauty
Business
Weapons
Sports
Travel
Health
Real Estate
Entertainment
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Shop Pay
Klarna
Afterpay
Affirm🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.