🆚 Slick vs. Smart Slider
- 📈 Slick is much more popular than Smart Slider.
- 🌎 Slick is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Smart Slider is more popular in Guinea and Dominica.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
SlickType
JavaScript library
WordPress plugin
About
Slick is an open-source, fully responsive and accessible carousel library.
WordPress
JoomlaHeadquarters
Győr, Hungary
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free version ✔️
Pro$49
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Slick JavaScript library is 11 times more popular than Smart Slider.
Total websites
Market share
Sliders
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Slick is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom, while Smart Slider is more popular in Guinea and Dominica.
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
Germany
India
France
Italy
Russia
Australia
Brazil
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the Faroe Islands in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Gibraltar in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Botswana in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Sliders category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the Dominican Republic in the Sliders category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Colombia in the Sliders category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in the Philippines in the Sliders category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Peru in the Sliders category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Kenya in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Slick is more popular than Smart Slider in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Sports
Health
Entertainment
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Swiper
Owl Carousel
Tiny Slider
Jetpack
GTM4WP🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,371,940 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.