🆚 Slick vs. TouchSwipe
- 📈 Slick is much more popular than TouchSwipe.
- 🌎 Slick is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 TouchSwipe is more popular in Greenland.
SlickType
About
Slick is an open-source 
jQuery carousel library for creating responsive, touch-enabled, and keyboard-accessible content sliders.
It offers more than 50 configuration options, responsive breakpoint-specific settings, infinite looping, lazy loading, variable-width and vertical layouts, synchronized sliders, and 
CSS3 transitions.
TouchSwipe is an open-source jQuery plugin that adds touch gesture recognition to web applications on mobile and touch-enabled devices.
It detects one-finger and two-finger swipe gestures in four directions, pinch in and pinch out, tap, double tap, long tap, and hold events, and falls back to mouse drag events on desktop browsers.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the U.S. Virgin Islands in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Sliders category.
- ⬆️ 32nd most popular in Malta in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 33rd most popular in Spain in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 34th most popular in Argentina in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 34th most popular in Uruguay in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 35th most popular in Chile in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,815,889 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.