🆚 SQLite vs. Supabase
- 📈 Supabase is three times more popular than SQLite.
- 🌎 Supabase is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France.
- 🌍 SQLite is more popular in Poland, Germany, and the Netherlands.
SQLite
SupabaseType
About
SQLite is a lightweight open source cross-platform single-file SQL database engine with zero-configuration and serverless architecture.
It implements most of SQL-92 standard, supports ACID transactions even after system crashes, offers 
JSON support and partial indexes, and allows databases up to about 281 terabytes.
Supabase is an open-source backend-as-a-service platform based on 
PostgreSQL.
It provides a hosted Postgres database with RESTful and 
GraphQL APIs, built-in authentication, secure file storage, support for edge functions written in 
TypeScript with global deployment, role-based access control, and row-level security.
Headquarters
Pricing
(8 GB per project, 100K MAU)$25+/month
(+ SSO)$599+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Poland in the Databases category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Sweden in the Databases category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the Netherlands in the Databases category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Germany in the Databases category.
- 🥇 Most popular in China in the Authentication category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Brazil in the Authentication category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in China in the Databases category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in France in the Authentication category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in India in the Authentication category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Microsoft SQL Server
Tarantool
Amazon Web Services
Microsoft Azure
Firebase
Google App Engine🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,359,906 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.