🆚 Styled Components vs. StyleX
- 📈 Styled Components is four times more popular than StyleX.
- 🌎 Styled Components is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 StyleX is more popular in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Malaysia.
Type
About
Styled-components is an open-source CSS-in-JS library for
React that allows developers to define component styles directly within
JavaScript and
TypeScript code.
It generates unique class names to scope styles automatically, supports dynamic styling based on component props, theming through React context, server-side rendering, and automatic vendor prefixing.
StyleX is an open-source styling system and CSS-in-JS library developed by Meta for building and maintaining large-scale web applications.
It compiles styles to static, collision-free atomic CSS rules at build time, supports type-safe style definitions, media queries, pseudo-classes, theming through shared variables, and is designed to eliminate runtime style injection overhead.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Taiwan in the Components category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Sweden in the Components category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Denmark in the Components category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Finland in the Components category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Poland in the Components category.
- ⬆️ 100th most popular in Poland in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 101st most popular in the Czech Republic in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 111st most popular in Lithuania in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 112nd most popular in Hungary in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 115th most popular in Malaysia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,580,200 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.


Normalize.css
Emotion