StyleX
StyleX is an open-source styling system and CSS-in-JS library developed by Meta for building and maintaining large-scale web applications.
It compiles styles to static, collision-free atomic CSS rules at build time, supports type-safe style definitions, media queries, pseudo-classes, theming through shared variables, and is designed to eliminate runtime style injection overhead.
- π Website
- </> Source code
πΈ Pricing
StyleX is available for free.
β‘ Sites Built With StyleX
| # | Website | Rank | Country | Language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | #2 | United States | English | |
| 2 | instagram.com |
#5 | United States | English |
| 3 | #203 | United States | English | |
| 4 | #386 | United States | English | |
| 5 | #21,132 | Sweden | Swedish | |
| 6 | #22,975 | Iceland | Icelandic | |
| 7 | #24,609 | United States | English | |
| 8 | #30,574 | Argentina | European Spanish | |
| 9 | #36,184 | Poland | Polish | |
| 10 | United States | English | ||
| 11 | #56,136 | Ukraine | Ukrainian | |
| 12 | #59,975 | United States | English | |
| 13 | #67,349 | Czech Republic | Czech | |
| 14 | #81,177 | Israel | Hebrew | |
| 15 | l.instagram.com |
United States | English | |
| 16 | #94,833 | Germany | German | |
| 17 | #98,936 | United States | English | |
| 18 | #104,197 | Maldives | American English | |
| 19 | #107,981 | United States | American English | |
| 20 | #126,922 | Philippines | American English |
π Usage Statistics
Most of the sites that use StyleX:
- are located in the United States
- have content in English
- use the .com domain extension
- fall into the Business category.
Most of the sites using StyleX are from the United States, Germany, and Poland.
- United States 15.2%
- Germany 8.1%
- Poland 7.6%
- United Kingdom 6.3%
- France 5.3%
- Czech Republic 3.8%
- Italy 3.3%
- Canada 2.7%
- Netherlands 2.7%
- Other 45%
Most StyleX users speak English, German, or Polish.
- English 41.3%
- German 9.3%
- Polish 7%
- French 6.3%
- Spanish 5.1%
- Czech 3.5%
- Dutch 3.2%
- Italian 2.5%
- Swedish 1.8%
- Other 20%
The StyleX JavaScript library is especially popular on .com, .org, and .de top-level domains.
- .com 24.2%
- .org 10.1%
- .de 6.3%
- .pl 5.1%
- .cz 3.5%
- .it 2.6%
- .co.uk 2.5%
- .net 2.1%
- .fr 1.9%
- Other 41.7%
The primary market segments for websites utilizing StyleX include business, marketing and merchandising, and online shopping.
- Business 11.9%
- Marketing/Merchandising 10.2%
- Online Shopping 8.5%
- Blogs/Wiki 8.5%
- Public Information 6.8%
- Entertainment 5.9%
- Education/Reference 5.1%
- Travel 4.2%
- Sports 4.2%
- Other 34.7%
π΅οΈ Similar Technologies
These are some of the best StyleX alternatives.
π Compare Alternatives
Compare StyleX toβ¦
- π΅οΈ Similar libraries
- β Market leaders
- π‘ More alternatives
- π All options
π¬ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the company behind StyleX?
StyleX is owned by Meta Platforms, Inc., headquartered in Menlo Park, California, United States.
Can I use StyleX for free?
Yes, it is a free JavaScript library.
It is also open source, and its code is available on GitHub.
Which country uses StyleX the most?
The majority of StyleX users are from the United States.
Who uses StyleX?
According to our data, StyleX is used on hundreds of sites, including facebook.com,
instagram.com, and meta.com.
Is StyleX used on government websites?
Yes, for example, it is used by coloradosprings.gov. In total, we found StyleX on 4 government sites in the United States.
Do academic institutions use StyleX?
Yes. The most prominent of these are unam.edu.ar,
mtech.edu, and
mnu.edu.mv. In total, we know of 5 academic websites in the United States that use StyleX.
What are the alternatives to StyleX?
Alternatives and possible competitors to StyleX may include Styled Components,
Emotion, and Tailwind CSS.
π See Also
ποΈ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.