🆚 Two.js vs. Vivus
- 📈 Vivus is much more popular than Two.js.
- 🌎 Vivus is more popular in the United States, Italy, and Germany.
- 🌍 Two.js is more popular in Denmark.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
A two-dimensional drawing library with the the same API for SVG, canvas, and 
WebGL.
Vivus is a lightweight 
JavaScript library that allows you to animate SVGs, giving them the appearance of being drawn.
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Vivus JavaScript library is 22 times more popular than Two.js.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Vivus is more popular in the United States, Italy, and Germany, while Two.js is more popular in Denmark.
United States
Italy
Germany
United Kingdom
Japan
India
Spain
Australia
Turkey
Netherlands
Awards
- ⬆️ 143rd most popular in Denmark in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 225th most popular in the United Kingdom in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Argentina in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Turkey in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Pakistan in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Chile in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Serbia in the Animation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Vivus is more popular than Two.js in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Travel
Online Shopping
Software/Hardware
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Paper.js
Raphael
Fabric.js
PixiJS
Snap.svg🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,690 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.