🆚 Phaser vs. Two.js
- 📈 Two.js is twice as popular as Phaser.
- 🌎 Two.js is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Denmark.
- 🌍 Phaser is more popular in the Netherlands, Spain, and the Czech Republic.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
PhaserType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Phaser is a fast 2D game framework with support for Canvas and 
WebGL rendering for building HTML5 games for desktop and mobile web browsers.
A two-dimensional drawing library with the the same API for SVG, canvas, and WebGL.
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Pricing
Free version ✔️Open source
Developer License (+ Visual Editor + 1 GB Asset Storage + Email support)$10/month
Professional License (+ Playable Ads Project Templates + Phaser Compressor + 100 GB Asset Storage)$45/month
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Two.js JavaScript library is 2.1 times more popular than Phaser.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Two.js is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Denmark, while Phaser is more popular in the Netherlands, Spain, and the Czech Republic.
United States
United Kingdom
Denmark
Germany
India
Netherlands
France
China
Poland
Russia
Awards
- ⬆️ 143rd most popular in Denmark in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 225th most popular in the United Kingdom in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Two.js is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and blogs and wiki, while Phaser is more commonly used on online shopping, software and hardware, and entertainment sites.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Software/Hardware
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Sports
Interactive Web Applications
Internet Services
Real Estate
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Paper.js
Fabric.js
PixiJS
Raphael🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,532,128 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.