🆚 Fabric.js vs. Phaser
- 📈 Fabric.js is much more popular than Phaser.
- 🌍 Fabric.js is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Fabric.js is a JavaScript canvas library with serialization and SVG-to-canvas/canvas-to-SVG parsers.
Phaser is a fast 2D game framework with support for Canvas and WebGL rendering for building HTML5 games for desktop and mobile web browsers.
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free version ✔️Open source
Developer License (+ Visual Editor + 1 GB Asset Storage + Email support)$10/month
Professional License (+ Playable Ads Project Templates + Phaser Compressor + 100 GB Asset Storage)$45/month
Categories
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #186
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #282
Animation › Rank #17
Animation › Rank #27
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Fabric.js JavaScript library is 19 times more popular than Phaser.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Animation
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Fabric.js is more popular than Phaser in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
India
Australia
Germany
Canada
Netherlands
Italy
France
Spain
Awards
- 🔥 13rd most popular in the United Kingdom in the Animation category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in the United States in the Animation category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in China in the Animation category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in New Zealand in the Animation category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in India in the Animation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Fabric.js is more popular than Phaser in all market segments.
Online Shopping
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Fashion/Beauty
Internet Services
Real Estate
Software/Hardware
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Education/Reference
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Phaser
Paper.js
PixiJS