🆚 Phaser vs. PixiJS
- 📈 PixiJS is much more popular than Phaser.
- 🌎 PixiJS is more popular in Japan, the United States, and Germany.
- 🌍 Phaser is more popular in Hungary.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Phaser is a fast 2D game framework with support for Canvas and WebGL rendering for building HTML5 games for desktop and mobile web browsers.
PixiJS is a rendering library with WebGPU/WebGL support for creating rich, interactive graphics and cross-platform applications and games.
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Pricing
Free version ✔️ Open source
Developer License (+ Visual Editor + 1 GB Asset Storage + Email support) $10/month
Professional License (+ Playable Ads Project Templates + Phaser Compressor + 100 GB Asset Storage) $45/month
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #287
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #243
Animation › Rank #28
Animation › Rank #22
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The PixiJS JavaScript library is 6 times more popular than Phaser.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Animation
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
PixiJS is more popular in Japan, the United States, and Germany, while Phaser is more popular in Hungary.
Japan
United States
Germany
Italy
Spain
France
Netherlands
United Kingdom
Russia
Canada
Awards
- 🔥 16th most popular in Japan in the Animation category.
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in the United States in the Animation category.
- ⬆️ 156th most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
PixiJS is more popular among sites focused on business, online shopping, and games, while Phaser is more commonly used on interactive web applications sites.
Business
Online Shopping
Games
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki
Marketing/Merchandising
Fashion/Beauty
Travel
Software/Hardware
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Phaser
PixiJS
