🆚 Babylon.js vs. PixiJS
- 📈 PixiJS is twice as popular as Babylon.js.
- 🌎 PixiJS is more popular in the United States, Japan, and Germany.
- 🌍 Babylon.js is more popular in the Czech Republic, Israel, and Hungary.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Babylon.js is a full-featured 3D game and rendering engine built on the WebGL platform.
PixiJS is a rendering library with WebGPU/WebGL support for creating rich, interactive graphics and cross-platform applications and games.
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The PixiJS JavaScript library is 2.1 times more popular than Babylon.js.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
PixiJS is more popular in the United States, Japan, and Germany, while Babylon.js is more popular in the Czech Republic, Israel, and Hungary.
United States
Japan
Germany
Italy
Spain
France
Australia
United Kingdom
Canada
Russia
Awards
- ⬆️ 253rd most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🔥 16th most popular in Japan in the Animation category.
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in the United States in the Animation category.
- ⬆️ 156th most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
PixiJS is more popular among sites focused on business, online shopping, and games, while Babylon.js is more commonly used on travel, general news, and finance and banking sites.
Business
Online Shopping
Travel
Games
Entertainment
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Fashion/Beauty
Internet Services
Software/Hardware
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
PixiJS

