🆚 Konva.js vs. PixiJS
- 📈 PixiJS is much more popular than Konva.js.
- 🌎 PixiJS is more popular in the United States, Japan, and Italy.
- 🌍 Konva.js is more popular in Poland and the Czech Republic.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Konva is an HTML5 Canvas
JavaScript framework that enables high performance animations, transitions, node nesting, layering, filtering, caching, and event handling.
PixiJS is a rendering library with WebGPU/WebGL support for creating rich, interactive graphics and cross-platform applications and games.
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #292
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #243
Animation › Rank #31
Animation › Rank #21
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The PixiJS JavaScript library is 12 times more popular than Konva.js.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Animation
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
PixiJS is more popular in the United States, Japan, and Italy, while Konva.js is more popular in Poland and the Czech Republic.
United States
Japan
Italy
Germany
Australia
Spain
United Kingdom
Netherlands
France
Canada
Awards
- 🔥 16th most popular in Japan in the Animation category.
- 🔥 19th most popular in Italy in the Animation category.
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in the United States in the Animation category.
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in Germany in the Animation category.
- ⬆️ 164th most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
PixiJS is more popular than Konva.js in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Games
Fashion/Beauty
Entertainment
Travel
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
PixiJS
Paper.js
Phaser