🆚 Konva.js vs. Phaser
- 📈 Phaser is noticeably more popular than Konva.js.
- 🌎 Phaser is more popular in the United States, the Netherlands, and Germany.
- 🌍 Konva.js is more popular in Poland, Turkey, and Switzerland.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
PhaserType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Konva is an 
HTML5 Canvas 
JavaScript framework that enables high performance animations, transitions, node nesting, layering, filtering, caching, and event handling.
Phaser is a fast 2D game framework with support for Canvas and 
WebGL rendering for building HTML5 games for desktop and mobile web browsers.
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free version ✔️ Open source
Developer License (+ Visual Editor + 1 GB Asset Storage + Email support) $10/month
Professional License (+ Playable Ads Project Templates + Phaser Compressor + 100 GB Asset Storage) $45/month
Categories
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #293
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #287
Animation › Rank #31
Animation › Rank #28
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Phaser JavaScript library is 1.8 times more popular than Konva.js.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Animation
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Phaser is more popular in the United States, the Netherlands, and Germany, while Konva.js is more popular in Poland, Turkey, and Switzerland.
United States
Netherlands
Germany
Spain
Poland
United Kingdom
Russia
Australia
France
Turkey
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Phaser is more popular among sites focused on business, online shopping, and entertainment, while Konva.js is more commonly used on Internet services and marketing and merchandising sites.
Business
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Marketing/Merchandising
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Education/Reference
Interactive Web Applications
Art/Culture/Heritage
Games
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.