⚡ Load Balancers in Finland

Load balancers are software components or network devices that distribute incoming traffic across multiple backend servers, improving application availability, scalability, and fault tolerance by preventing any single server from becoming a bottleneck.

Finland is a Northern European country with a population of around 5.6 million people.

According to our statistics, load balancers are detected on 7.5% of websites from Finland.

Statistics based on 18K+ analyzed websites. About this data

⭐ Most Popular in 2026

The following chart shows the top load balancers in Finland in 2026, based on market share.

The most popular is Varnish with an impressive share of 32.9%, followed by AWS Elastic Load Balancer with 20.6% and Google Cloud Load Balancer with 20.4%.

Varnish 32.9%
AWS Elastic Load Balancer 20.6%
Google Cloud Load Balancer 20.4%
Application Request Routing 11.4%
F5 BIG-IP 9.2%
Azure Application Gateway 4.4%
Azure Front Door 3.9%
Envoy 3.7%
Heroku Vegur 1.6%
HAProxy 0.4%
Kong Gateway 0.2%
Sucuri CloudProxy 0.1%
NetScaler 0.07%

🚀 Highlights

Here is a list of the top load balancers that are more popular in Finland than worldwide.
Differences between global and country rankings are shown in parentheses.

2. AWS Elastic Load Balancer ^(-1)
4. Application Request Routing ^(-1)
6. Azure Application Gateway ^(-3)
7. Azure Front Door ^(-1)
9. Heroku Vegur ^(-1)
10. HAProxy ^(-3)
11. Kong Gateway ^(-5)
13. NetScaler ^(-2)

✨ Best Load Balancers

Below is a more detailed list of 13 load balancers used on sites from Finland, ranked by their market share.

Rank	Name	Market share
1	Varnish Stockholm, Sweden An open-source web application accelerator, also known as a caching HTTP reverse proxy. FreeOpen source$1,500+/year	32.9%
2	AWS Elastic Load Balancer Seattle, Washington, United States Automatically distributes incoming traffic across multiple targets, such as EC2 instances, containers, and IP addresses. Free$$$	20.6%
3	Google Cloud Load Balancer Mountain View, California, United States Distributes user traffic across virtual machine instances in the same region.	20.4%
4	Application Request Routing Redmond, Washington, United States A module for Internet Information Server that can load-balance between multiple servers in a server farm.	11.4%
5	F5 BIG-IP Seattle, Washington, United States An enterprise-grade application delivery controller and full reverse proxy platform for managing, securing, and optimizing web and API traffic. $3,200+/year	9.2%
6	Azure Application Gateway Redmond, Washington, United States A managed web traffic load balancer and full reverse proxy that enables scalable, highly available, and secure web application delivery on Azure. $0.0255+/hour	4.4%
7	Azure Front Door Redmond, Washington, United States A cloud content delivery network service that offers Layer 7 load-balancing capabilities. $35+/month	3.9%
8	Envoy San Francisco, California, United States A high-performance, open source edge and service proxy designed for cloud-native applications and large microservice "service mesh" architectures. FreeOpen source	3.7%
9	Heroku Vegur San Francisco, California, United States Open-source proxy and load balancing software. FreeOpen source	1.6%
10	HAProxy Newton, Massachusetts, United States A high-performance reverse proxy and load balancer for TCP- and HTTP-based applications. FreeOpen source$$$	0.4%
11	Kong Gateway San Francisco, California, United States An API gateway that manages, secures, and routes API traffic using a cloud-native, platform-agnostic architecture. FreeOpen source$105+/month	0.2%
12	Sucuri CloudProxy Tempe, Arizona, United States A website application firewall that stops bad actors, speeds up load times, and increases website availability.	0.1%
13	NetScaler Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States An application delivery and security platform that provides high-performance load balancing, application delivery, and security solutions. $11,000+/year	0.07%

👉 See Also

🌎 Load Balancers in other countries

🗃️ About This Data

We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
This report is based on the analysis of 18,983 websites from Finland.
We currently track the presence of 18 load balancers across the web.
Of these, 13 were detected on websites from Finland.
Statistics were last calculated on May 6, 2026.
For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.