⚡ Load Balancers in Russia

Load balancers are software components or network devices that distribute incoming traffic across multiple backend servers, improving application availability, scalability, and fault tolerance by preventing any single server from becoming a bottleneck.

Russia is a Eurasian country with a population of around 144 million people.

According to our statistics, load balancers are detected on 0.9% of websites from Russia.

Statistics based on 116K+ analyzed websites. About this data

⭐ Most Popular in 2026

The following chart shows the top load balancers in Russia in 2026, based on market share.

The most popular is Varnish with a share of 27.1%, followed by Caddy with 26.8% and Envoy with 23.5%.

Varnish 27.1%
Caddy 26.8%
Envoy 23.5%
Google Cloud Load Balancing 6.5%
F5 BIG-IP 6.1%
Istio 4.4%
Kong Gateway 3.6%
Application Request Routing 3.3%
AWS Elastic Load Balancer 2.3%
Google Front End 0.8%
HAProxy 0.7%
NetScaler 0.6%
Sucuri CloudProxy 0.6%
Azure Front Door 0.4%
Heroku Vegur 0.3%

🚀 Highlights

Here is a list of the top load balancers that are more popular in Russia than worldwide.
Differences between global and country rankings are shown in parentheses.

2. Caddy ^(-4)
3. Envoy ^(-4)
6. Istio ^(-6)
7. Kong Gateway ^(-12)
10. Google Front End ^(-1)
11. HAProxy ^(-5)
12. NetScaler ^(-3)
15. Heroku Vegur ^(-2)
17. Squid ^(-4)
19. Ngrok ^(-1)

✨ Best Load Balancers

Below is a more detailed list of 19 load balancers used on sites from Russia, ranked by their market share.

Rank	Name	Market share
1	Varnish Stockholm, Sweden An open-source HTTP accelerator and reverse caching proxy that caches content from web servers to reduce load times, and supports native TLS termination and Kubernetes deployments. FreeOpen source$$$	27.1%
2	Caddy Vienna, Austria An open-source multi-platform web server written in Go with built-in support for automatic HTTPS and modern web protocols. FreeOpen source	26.8%
3	Envoy San Francisco, California, United States A high-performance, open-source edge and service proxy designed for cloud-native applications and large microservice "service mesh" architectures. FreeOpen source	23.5%
4	Google Cloud Load Balancing Mountain View, California, United States A managed load balancing service that distributes application traffic across virtual machines and containers on Google Cloud. $0.025+/unit/hour	6.5%
5	F5 BIG-IP Seattle, Washington, United States An enterprise-grade application delivery controller and full reverse proxy platform for managing, securing, and optimizing web and API traffic. $3,200+/year	6.1%
6	Istio San Francisco, California, United States An open-source service mesh that secures, connects, and monitors services in Kubernetes, virtual machines, and multi-cloud environments. FreeOpen source	4.4%
7	Kong Gateway San Francisco, California, United States An API gateway that manages, secures, and routes API traffic using a cloud-native, platform-agnostic architecture. FreeOpen source$105+/month	3.6%
8	Application Request Routing Redmond, Washington, United States A module for Internet Information Server that can load-balance between multiple servers in a server farm.	3.3%
9	AWS Elastic Load Balancer Seattle, Washington, United States AWS Elastic Load Balancer automatically distributes incoming traffic across multiple targets, such as EC2 instances, containers, and IP addresses. Free$$$	2.3%
10	Google Front End Mountain View, California, United States Google's globally distributed reverse proxy that accepts client connections at the network edge and routes requests to Google services. $$$	0.8%
11	HAProxy Newton, Massachusetts, United States An open-source load balancer and reverse proxy for TCP and HTTP-based applications. FreeOpen source$$$	0.7%
12	NetScaler Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States An application delivery and security platform that provides load balancing, application acceleration, and application protection for web applications and APIs. $11,000+/year	0.6%
13	Sucuri CloudProxy Tempe, Arizona, United States A website application firewall that stops bad actors, speeds up load times, and increases website availability.	0.6%
14	Azure Front Door Redmond, Washington, United States A content delivery network service from the Microsoft Azure cloud that offers more than 100 edge locations, Layer 7 load-balancing capabilities, and TCP splitting paired with a private global Microsoft backbone network. $35+/month	0.4%
15	Heroku Vegur San Francisco, California, United States Open-source proxy and load balancing software. FreeOpen source	0.3%
16	Azure Application Gateway Redmond, Washington, United States A managed web traffic load balancer and full reverse proxy that enables scalable, highly available, and secure web application delivery on Azure. $0.0255+/hour	0.3%
17	Squid Westminster, Colorado, United States An open-source caching proxy server that is most commonly used as a forward proxy to cache outbound internet requests, reduce bandwidth, and improve access times. FreeOpen source	0.2%
18	Ivanti vADC South Jordan, Utah, United States A software-based application delivery controller solution that delivers applications with predictable performance and strong multi-layered security and includes Virtual Traffic Manager, Services Director and Web Application Firewall. $$$	0.2%
19	Ngrok San Francisco, California, United States A globally distributed reverse proxy platform that creates encrypted tunnels and consolidates load balancing, API gateway, and firewall capabilities for applications, APIs, and network services. Free$10+/month	0.1%

👉 See Also

🌎 Load Balancers in other countries

🗃️ About This Data

We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
This report is based on the analysis of 116,435 websites from Russia.
We currently track the presence of 24 load balancers across the web.
Of these, 19 were detected on websites from Russia.
Statistics were last calculated on November 2, 2026.
For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.