Sitemap

A sitemap is a file in XML format that allows webmasters to inform search engines about URLs on a website that are available for web crawling.

According to our data, Sitemap is present on 0.4% of all websites.

πŸ“Š Rankings and Market Share

πŸ† Sitemap Awards

⚑ Sites Using Sitemap

We have data on 12,754 websites that use Sitemap. Here is a list of some of the top ranked ones.

The highest rated site using Sitemap is fastly.com.

#WebsiteRankCountryLanguage
1 fastly.com #94 United States American English
2 pussyboy.net #836 English
3 ap**nvideo.com #903 English
4 s***amatkadpboss.co #956 India English
5 desitelugus*x.com #965 English
6 s*xybluefilm.com #966 English
7 livechat.com #1,023 United States American English
8 texas.gov #1,244 United States English
9 petfinder.com #1,474 Switzerland English
10 trimble.com #1,679 English
11 freee.co.jp #1,758 Japan Japanese
12 healthcare.gov #1,854 United States English
13 developers.cloudflare.com United States English
14 radiofarda.com #2,891 Iran Persian
15 voanews.com #2,916 English
16 audacityteam.org #3,574 English
17 helpscout.com #3,781 United States English
18 123moviesfree.net #3,942 English
19 fmovies.co #3,972 Canada English
20 babepedia.com #4,085 American English

πŸ“ˆ Usage Statistics

Most of the sites that use Sitemap:

Most of the sites using Sitemap are from the United States, Japan, and Germany.

  • United States 18%
  • Japan 7.7%
  • Germany 6.7%
  • United Kingdom 6.7%
  • France 3.7%
  • Netherlands 3.5%
  • Poland 3.4%
  • Brazil 3.3%
  • Australia 3.3%
  • Other 43.7%

Most Sitemap users speak English, Japanese, or German.

  • English 56%
  • Japanese 6.2%
  • German 5%
  • Spanish 3.4%
  • French 3%
  • Portuguese 3%
  • Chinese 2.4%
  • Polish 2.4%
  • Dutch 2.2%
  • Other 16.4%

Sitemap is especially popular on .com top-level domains.

  • .com 43.8%
  • .org 4.4%
  • .net 3.8%
  • .de 3.3%
  • .co.uk 2%
  • .com.au 1.9%
  • .ru 1.8%
  • .io 1.7%
  • .pl 1.7%
  • Other 35.6%

The primary market segments for websites utilizing Sitemap include business, marketing and merchandising, and Internet services.

  • Business 18.6%
  • Marketing/Merchandising 8.9%
  • Internet Services 7.3%
  • Online Shopping 6.3%
  • Blogs/Wiki 5.7%
  • Sports 5.6%
  • Education/Reference 5%
  • Software/Hardware 4.4%
  • Entertainment 4.1%
  • Other 34.1%

πŸ•΅οΈ Similar Technologies

These are some of the best Sitemap alternatives.

RankName
5
RSD

An XML format that helps client software find the services needed to read, edit, or "work with" weblogging software.

12
Pingback

A method for web authors to request notification when somebody links to one of their documents.

19
OpenSearch
Seattle, Washington, United States

A specification that describes a website's search engine, enabling browsers, apps, and services to discover and integrate it.

30
Humans.txt

A text file that can be created by developers to list the people who have contributed to a website.

40
LLMs.txt

A proposed standard that provides structured content and instructions to guide large language models in understanding and summarizing a website's content.

πŸ†š Compare Alternatives

Compare Sitemap to…

πŸ’¬ Frequently Asked Questions

Which country uses Sitemap the most?

The majority of Sitemap users are from the United States.

Who uses Sitemap?

According to our data, Sitemap is used on thousands of sites, including such established ones as fastly.com, livechat.com, and texas.gov.

Is Sitemap used on government websites?

Yes, for example, it is used by texas.gov and healthcare.gov. In total, we found Sitemap on 13 government sites in the United States.

Do academic institutions use Sitemap?

Yes. Overall, we know of 26 academic websites in the United States that use Sitemap.

How does Sitemap stack up against the competition?

Sitemap is a moderately popular standard, ranking ahead of 28 other standards we track.

What are the alternatives to Sitemap?

Alternatives and possible competitors to Sitemap may include Humans.txt, LLMs.txt, and OpenSearch.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.