🆚 AjaxZip2 vs. Owl Carousel
- 📈 Owl Carousel is much more popular than AjaxZip2.
- 🌍 Owl Carousel is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ AjaxZip2 is particularly popular in Japan.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Owl CarouselType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
AjaxZip2 is a Japanese postal code to address converter library.
Owl Carousel is a deprecated open-source 
jQuery plugin for creating responsive, touch-enabled, and accessible carousel sliders.
It offers more than 60 configuration options, responsive breakpoint settings, touch and mouse drag support, infinite looping, autoplay, lazy loading, auto-width items, and CSS3 hardware-accelerated transitions with CSS2 fallback for older browsers.
Headquarters
Germany
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Owl Carousel JavaScript library is 1,868 times more popular than AjaxZip2.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Owl Carousel is more popular than AjaxZip2 in all countries.
United States
India
United Kingdom
Italy
Russia
Germany
Spain
France
Brazil
Turkey
Awards
- ⬆️ 141st most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Russia in the Legacy category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Owl Carousel is more popular than AjaxZip2 in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Health
Entertainment
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.