🆚 Owl Carousel vs. Tiny Slider
- 📈 Owl Carousel is much more popular than Tiny Slider.
- 🌎 Owl Carousel is more popular in the United States, India, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Tiny Slider is more popular in Guam.
Tiny SliderType
About
Owl Carousel is a deprecated open-source 
jQuery plugin for creating responsive, touch-enabled, and accessible carousel sliders.
It offers more than 60 configuration options, responsive breakpoint settings, touch and mouse drag support, infinite looping, autoplay, lazy loading, auto-width items, and CSS3 hardware-accelerated transitions with CSS2 fallback for older browsers.
Tiny Slider is an open-source vanilla 
JavaScript slider library for creating responsive carousels and galleries without external dependencies, inspired by 
Owl Carousel.
It supports carousel and gallery modes, horizontal and vertical layouts, responsive breakpoint configuration, touch and mouse drag, lazy loading, autoplay, and keyboard accessibility.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Legacy category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Indonesia in the Sliders category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Brazil in the Sliders category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in the Netherlands in the Sliders category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Poland in the Sliders category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Argentina in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Swiper
Slick
Flickity
Splide
Fancyapps🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.