🆚 Fancyapps vs. Tiny Slider
- 📈 Fancyapps is much more popular than Tiny Slider.
- 🌎 Fancyapps is more popular in the United States, Russia, and Germany.
- 🌍 Tiny Slider is more popular in Guam.
Type
About
Fancyapps is a commercial JavaScript UI component library for creating lightboxes, carousels, and interactive image viewers.
It provides touch gesture support, synchronized and nested carousels, image zooming and panning, lazy loading, configurable plugins, and integrations with React,
Vue, and plain JavaScript applications.
Tiny Slider is an open-source vanilla JavaScript slider library for creating responsive carousels and galleries without external dependencies, inspired by
Owl Carousel.
It supports carousel and gallery modes, horizontal and vertical layouts, responsive breakpoint configuration, touch and mouse drag, lazy loading, autoplay, and keyboard accessibility.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the U.S. Virgin Islands in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Russia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the Czech Republic in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Slovakia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Belarus in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Indonesia in the Sliders category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Brazil in the Sliders category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in the Netherlands in the Sliders category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Poland in the Sliders category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Argentina in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,603,958 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Lightbox
PhotoSwipe
LightGallery
Slick