🆚 Owl Carousel vs. Slick
- 📈 Slick is slightly more popular than Owl Carousel.
- 🌎 Slick is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Owl Carousel is more popular in India, Italy, and Russia.
Owl Carousel
SlickType
About
Owl Carousel is a deprecated open-source 
jQuery plugin for creating responsive, touch-enabled, and accessible carousel sliders.
It offers more than 60 configuration options, responsive breakpoint settings, touch and mouse drag support, infinite looping, autoplay, lazy loading, auto-width items, and CSS3 hardware-accelerated transitions with CSS2 fallback for older browsers.
Slick is an open-source jQuery carousel library for creating responsive, touch-enabled, and keyboard-accessible content sliders.
It offers more than 50 configuration options, responsive breakpoint-specific settings, infinite looping, lazy loading, variable-width and vertical layouts, synchronized sliders, and 
CSS3 transitions.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the Faroe Islands in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Swiper
Flickity
Splide
Tiny Slider
Fancyapps🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.