🆚 Akamai Object Storage vs. Backblaze B2

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Cloud storage service
Cloud storage service

About

Akamai Object Storage is a globally available, S3-compliant, fault-tolerant storage solution.

Backblaze B2 is hot cloud object storage that is fully compatible with AWS S3, but for less money.

Headquarters

Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ❌
250 GB$5/month
500 GB$10/month
1 TB$20/month
5 TB$100/month
10 TB$200/month
50 TB$1000/month
Pay-As-You-Go$6/TB/month
B2 Reserve$1,560/20TB/year

Categories

Cloud Storages › Rank #13
Cloud Storages › Rank #16

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Akamai Object Storage service is 1.6 times more popular than Backblaze B2.
Total websites

Market share

Cloud Storages

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Akamai Object Storage is more popular in Indonesia, Sweden, and Brazil, while Backblaze B2 is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Kenya.
United States
United Kingdom
Indonesia
Sweden
Brazil
India
Netherlands
Canada
Australia
Germany

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Akamai Object Storage is more popular among sites focused on general news, marketing and merchandising, and sports, while Backblaze B2 is more commonly used on business, software and hardware, and blogs and wiki sites.
Business
General News
Internet Services
Marketing/Merchandising
Sports
Travel
Software/Hardware
Blogs/Wiki
Real Estate
Entertainment

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
View more ➝
Name
Rank
rule34.dev
#9,163
#22,797
#27,796
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.