🆚 AMP vs. LuxaCSS
- 📈 AMP is much more popular than LuxaCSS.
- 🌍 AMP is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ LuxaCSS is particularly popular in Belgium.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
AMP
LuxaCSSType
Website component
User interface framework
About
AMP, short for Accelerated Mobile Pages, is an open-source 
HTML framework originally created by 
Google for building lightweight web pages optimized for fast loading on mobile devices.
It uses a restricted set of HTML components, asynchronous resource loading, sandboxed 
JavaScript, and a component library for images, video, advertising, analytics, and interactive content.
A clean and lightweight 
CSS kit that prioritizes minimalism, speed, and ease of maintenance.
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Londrina, Brazil
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
AMP component technology is 39,604 times more popular than LuxaCSS.
Total websites
Market share
UI Frameworks
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
AMP is more popular than LuxaCSS in all countries.
Indonesia
United States
Turkey
United Kingdom
Russia
India
Brazil
Japan
France
Germany
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Indonesia in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Turkey in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Singapore in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Vietnam in the Components category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
AMP is more popular than LuxaCSS in all market segments.
Blogs/Wiki
General News
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Travel
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Name
Rank
#838,183
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Normalize.css
Styled Components
Hover.css
MIP
OpenJS Foundation company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,795 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.