🆚 AMP vs. Mantine
- 📈 AMP is much more popular than Mantine.
- 🌎 AMP is more popular in Indonesia, the United States, and Turkey.
- 🌍 Mantine is more popular in Barbados.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Website component
User interface framework
About
AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages) is an open-source 
HTML framework for creating lightweight pages that are optimized for mobile web browsing and load faster.
Mantine is an open-source 
React component library that includes over 100 customizable components.
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
AMP component technology is 78 times more popular than Mantine.
Total websites
Market share
UI Frameworks
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
AMP is more popular in Indonesia, the United States, and Turkey, while Mantine is more popular in Barbados.
Indonesia
United States
Turkey
United Kingdom
Russia
India
Brazil
Japan
France
Germany
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Indonesia in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Turkey in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Singapore in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Vietnam in the Components category.
- ⬆️ 28th most popular in the United States in the UI Frameworks category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
AMP is more popular than Mantine in all market segments.
Blogs/Wiki
Business
General News
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Travel
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Normalize.css
Hover.css
MIP
Bootstrap
Radix UI
Ant Design
OpenJS Foundation company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.