🆚 AMP vs. Tailwind CSS
- 📈 Tailwind CSS is three times more popular than AMP.
- 🌎 Tailwind CSS is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 AMP is more popular in Indonesia, Turkey, and Russia.
Tailwind CSSType
About
AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages) is an open-source 
HTML framework for creating lightweight pages that are optimized for mobile web browsing and load faster.
Tailwind 
CSS is an open-source utility-first framework that provides low-level CSS classes for building user interfaces directly in markup.
It includes hundreds of utility classes, supports responsive design and dark mode, enables tree-shaking to remove unused styles for optimized builds, and offers 500+ UI blocks, 10+ templates, and the Catalyst UI kit via paid Tailwind Plus, formerly known as Tailwind UI.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Indonesia in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Turkey in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Singapore in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Vietnam in the Components category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the Maldives in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Saint Helena in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United States in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United Kingdom in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Germany in the UI Frameworks category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Normalize.css
Hover.css
MIP
Bootstrap
Foundation
Bulma
Spectre.css
OpenJS Foundation company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,512,920 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.