🆚 Anubis vs. Imperva WAF
- 📈 Imperva WAF is much more popular than Anubis.
- 🌎 Imperva WAF is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
- 🌍 Anubis is more popular in Russia, Slovakia, and Latvia.
AnubisType
About
Anubis is an open-source anti-bot solution designed to use a proof-of-work challenge to website visitors before granting access.
It aims to stop AI crawlers and requires clients to have 
JavaScript enabled and use a modern browser able to calculate SHA-256 checksums.
Imperva Cloud WAF protects websites from automated vulnerability scans, Layer 7 DDoS attacks, and malicious bots. It also provides advanced bot protection using device fingerprinting with over 200 attributes, threat intelligence feeds, managed rules, and attack analytics to block or control suspicious traffic.
Headquarters
Pricing
(unbranded version)$50+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Germany in the Bot Mitigation category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in France in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in the United States in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Spain in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in France in the Bot Mitigation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Cloudflare Bot Management
Akamai Bot Manager
Datadome
AWS WAF Captcha
Oracle WAF🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,431,368 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.