🆚 AppTrana WAF vs. Cloudflare Bot Management
- 📈 Cloudflare Bot Management is much more popular than AppTrana WAF.
- 🌍 Cloudflare Bot Management is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ AppTrana WAF is particularly popular in India.
Cloudflare Bot ManagementType
About
AppTrana WAF is an AI-powered, fully managed web application firewall with zero-day vulnerability protection. It offers continuous discovery of exposed assets, autonomous virtual patching across web apps and APIs, and behavior-based DDoS and bot mitigation.
Cloudflare Bot Management is a security service that detects and mitigates automated bot traffic while allowing legitimate bots such as search engine crawlers.
It uses machine learning, behavioral analysis, and fingerprinting to score and classify traffic, offers configurable mitigation actions including block and challenge rules, and replaces traditional CAPTCHAs with an in-house alternative, 
Turnstile.
Headquarters
Pricing
(easy-to-detect bots)$25/month
(sophisticated bots, basic analytics)$250/month
(all bots, anomaly detection, advanced analytics)Custom
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in India in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🔥 18th most popular in the United States in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Australia in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Canada in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Brazil in the Bot Mitigation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
AWS WAF Captcha
Oracle WAF
Akamai Bot Manager
Datadome🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,511,995 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.