🆚 Autoprefixer vs. Custom Shape Dividers
- 📈 Autoprefixer is much more popular than Custom Shape Dividers.
- 🌎 Autoprefixer is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
- 🌍 Custom Shape Dividers is more popular in Iran.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
AutoprefixerType
CSS tool
CSS tool
About
Autoprefixer is a PostCSS plugin to parse 
CSS and add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use.
Custom Shape Dividers is an online tool to generate fully responsive CSS dividers.
GitHubPricing
Free ✔️Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Autoprefixer CSS tool is 29 times more popular than Custom Shape Dividers.
Total websites
Market share
CSS Tools
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Autoprefixer is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan, while Custom Shape Dividers is more popular in Iran.
United States
United Kingdom
Japan
Brazil
Germany
Canada
Australia
France
India
Italy
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Israel in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Hong Kong in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Taiwan in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Arab Emirates in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Chile in the CSS Tools category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United States in the CSS Tools category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Autoprefixer is more popular than Custom Shape Dividers in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Sports
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Health
Travel
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
RTLCSS
Parcel🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.