🆚 Autoprefixer vs. RTLCSS
- 📈 RTLCSS is noticeably more popular than Autoprefixer.
- 🌎 RTLCSS is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
- 🌍 Autoprefixer is more popular in Israel, Hong Kong, and Chile.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Autoprefixer
RTLCSSType
CSS tool
CSS tool
About
Autoprefixer is a PostCSS plugin to parse 
CSS and add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use.
RTLCSS is a framework for converting Left-To-Right (LTR) CSS to Right-To-Left (RTL).
Headquarters
Jordan
GitHubPricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
RTLCSS technology is 1.7 times more popular than Autoprefixer.
Total websites
Market share
CSS Tools
Tools
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
RTLCSS is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan, while Autoprefixer is more popular in Israel, Hong Kong, and Chile.
United States
United Kingdom
Japan
Germany
Brazil
Canada
France
Australia
Italy
Spain
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Israel in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Hong Kong in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Taiwan in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Arab Emirates in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Chile in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Spain in the CSS Tools category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
RTLCSS is more popular than Autoprefixer in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Entertainment
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Online Shopping
Travel
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Parcel🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.