🆚 Autoprefixer vs. PurgeCSS
- 📈 Autoprefixer is much more popular than PurgeCSS.
- 🌎 Autoprefixer is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
- 🌍 PurgeCSS is more popular in Belarus.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Autoprefixer
PurgeCSSType
CSS tool
CSS tool
About
Autoprefixer is a PostCSS plugin to parse 
CSS and add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use.
PurgeCSS is a tool to analyze and remove unused CSS.
Headquarters
Barcelona, Spain
London, United Kingdom
GitHubPricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Autoprefixer CSS tool is 63 times more popular than PurgeCSS.
Total websites
Market share
CSS Tools
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Autoprefixer is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan, while PurgeCSS is more popular in Belarus.
United States
United Kingdom
Japan
Brazil
Germany
Canada
Australia
France
India
Israel
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Brazil in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Israel in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Mexico in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in New Zealand in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Singapore in the CSS Tools category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Autoprefixer is more popular than PurgeCSS in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Travel
Sports
Restaurants
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,816,780 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.