🆚 Autoprefixer vs. Webpack
- 📈 Webpack is much more popular than Autoprefixer.
- 🌍 Webpack is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
CSS tool
Module bundler
About
Autoprefixer is a PostCSS plugin to parse CSS and add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use.
Webpack is a static module bundler for modern JavaScript applications.
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Webpack module bundler is 33 times more popular than Autoprefixer.
Total websites
Market share
Tools
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Webpack is more popular than Autoprefixer in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
Brazil
France
Spain
Australia
Italy
India
Canada
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Israel in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Mexico in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Hong Kong in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Taiwan in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Chile in the CSS Tools category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Module Bundlers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Tools category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Module Bundlers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Tools category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Module Bundlers category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Webpack is more popular than Autoprefixer in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Travel
Health
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki
Sports
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,527,621 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

RTLCSS
PostCSS
Parcel
Gulp
OpenJS Foundation company profile