🆚 AWS Elastic Load Balancer vs. Kong Gateway

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Load balancer
Load balancer

About

AWS Elastic Load Balancer automatically distributes incoming traffic across multiple targets, such as EC2 instances, containers, and IP addresses.

Kong Gateway is an API gateway that manages, secures, and routes API traffic using a cloud-native, platform-agnostic architecture.

It provides request proxying, routing, load balancing, health checks, authentication, rate limiting, and observability features, and can be extended through plugins written in Lua, Go, or JavaScript.

Headquarters

Seattle, Washington, United States
San Francisco, California, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️
$0.0225 per Application Load Balancer-hour
$0.008 per LCU-hour
Free version ✔️Open source
Kong Konnect$105+/month

Categories

Load Balancers › Rank #3
Load Balancers › Rank #16
Tools › Rank #27

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

AWS Elastic Load Balancer is 75 times more popular than Kong Gateway.
Total websites

Market share

Load Balancers

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

AWS Elastic Load Balancer is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom, while Kong Gateway is more popular in Russia.
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
Germany
Australia
Brazil
India
France
Korea
Canada

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

AWS Elastic Load Balancer is more popular than Kong Gateway in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Travel
Finance/Banking
Software/Hardware
General News
Health

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
dmm.co.jp
#149
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#2,052
#2,241
#2,268
#2,615
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.