🆚 Bigtable vs. ScyllaDB
- 📈 Bigtable is slightly more popular than ScyllaDB.
- 🌎 Bigtable is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Italy.
- 🌎 ScyllaDB is more popular in Japan, Russia, and Brazil.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Database technology
Database technology
About
Bigtable is a low-latency, high-throughput NoSQL and key-value database.
Scylla is a real-time, distributed database that is API-compatible with Apache Cassandra and Amazon DynamoDB.
Headquarters
Mountain View, California, United States
Sunnyvale, California, United States
Pricing
Free version ❌
Compute capacity$0.65/node/hour
Data storage
SSD$0.17/GB/month
HDD$0.026/GB/month
Free tier ✔️Max 10TB hard drive space of all ScyllaDB servers + 50vCPU per organization
ScyllaDB Cloud$2,800+/month
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Bigtable database technology is 1.1 times more popular than ScyllaDB.
Total websites
Market share
Databases
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Bigtable is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Italy, while ScyllaDB is more popular in Japan, Russia, and Brazil.
United States
Japan
Germany
Russia
Brazil
Italy
Sweden
France
United Kingdom
Thailand
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Bigtable is more popular among sites focused on Internet services, finance and banking, and streaming media, while ScyllaDB is more commonly used on business, software and hardware, and travel sites.
Business
Internet Services
Finance/Banking
Software/Hardware
Travel
Entertainment
Online Shopping
Streaming Media
Media Sharing
Dating/Personals
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,524,018 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.