🆚 bxSlider vs. Owl Carousel
- 📈 Owl Carousel is four times more popular than bxSlider.
- 🌎 Owl Carousel is more popular in the United States, India, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 bxSlider is more popular in Japan, Korea, and the British Virgin Islands.
bxSlider
Owl CarouselType
About
bxSlider is an open-source responsive 
jQuery content slider for displaying images, videos, and 
HTML content as slideshows or carousels.
It supports horizontal, vertical, and fade transitions, touch swipe gestures, ticker mode, image captions, and more than 50 configuration options for navigation, autoplay, looping, and slide behavior.
Owl Carousel is a deprecated open-source jQuery plugin for creating responsive, touch-enabled, and accessible carousel sliders.
It offers more than 60 configuration options, responsive breakpoint settings, touch and mouse drag support, infinite looping, autoplay, lazy loading, auto-width items, and CSS3 hardware-accelerated transitions with CSS2 fallback for older browsers.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Japan in the Sliders category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Korea in the Sliders category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Russia in the Sliders category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Korea in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in China in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Russia in the Legacy category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,815,889 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.