🆚 Cloudinary vs. Filestack
- 📈 Cloudinary is much more popular than Filestack.
- 🌎 Cloudinary is more popular in the United States, Indonesia, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Filestack is more popular in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
CloudinaryType
About
Cloudinary is a cloud-based image and video API platform that provides tools for uploading, managing, transforming, optimizing, and delivering digital media assets.
It offers automatic image and video optimization, on-the-fly transformations through URL parameters, AI-based features such as background removal and object detection, adaptive bitrate streaming, a media library with asset versioning and access control, and global CDN delivery.
Filestack is a cloud-based file management platform that offers tools and APIs for file uploading, transformation, and delivery.
Headquarters
Pricing
(20K file uploads, 75GB bandwidth)$69/month
(50K file uploads, 200GB bandwidth)$199/month
(125K file uploads, 400GB bandwidth)$379/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Indonesia in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Indonesia in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the DAM category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in the United States in the Image Optimization category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Image Optimization category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in the United Kingdom in the CDN category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in the United States in the CDN category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Cloudflare
Amazon CloudFront
Imgix
ImageKit🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.