🆚 Codeberg vs. Travis CI
- 📈 Codeberg is four times more popular than Travis CI.
- 🌎 Codeberg is more popular in Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Travis CI is more popular in China.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Travis CIType
Code hosting platform
CI/CD tool
About
Codeberg is a non-profit collaboration platform for hosting and developing free and open-source software projects, built on the 
Forgejo 
Git-based software forge.
It provides Git repository hosting, issue tracking, pull requests, code review, and wikis, and extends these with services such as 
Codeberg Pages for static site hosting, integrated CI/CD through Woodpecker CI and Forgejo Actions, and Weblate-based translation tools.
GitHub
Bitbucket
GitLabHeadquarters
Berlin, Germany
Berlin, Germany
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open-source projects only
Free tier ✔️ 10,000 credits, deducted per use, expire in one year
Usage-based $15+/month
Concurrency-based $69+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Codeberg platform is 4 times more popular than Travis CI.
Total websites
Market share
CI/CD
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Codeberg is more popular in Germany, the United States, and the United Kingdom, while Travis CI is more popular in China.
Germany
United States
United Kingdom
France
Switzerland
Finland
Vietnam
Netherlands
Turkey
Australia
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Germany in the CI/CD category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Germany in the Code Hosting category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Codeberg is more popular among sites focused on software and hardware, business, and blogs and wiki, while Travis CI is more commonly used on Internet services and technical information sites.
Software/Hardware
Business
Internet Services
Blogs/Wiki
Technical/Business Forums
Technical Information
Personal Pages
Games
Education/Reference
Forum/Bulletin Boards
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.