🆚 CorePublish vs. Enonic

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Content management system
Content management system

About

CorePublish is a Norwegian content management system.

Enonic is a composable content management platform that supports headless, hybrid, and traditional CMS architectures.

It provides a flexible schema system, multi-site and multi-language management, role-based access control, content versioning and workflows, starter kits for React and Next.js, GraphQL and REST APIs, and an integrated AI assistant called Juke that helps create, edit, and translate content.

Headquarters

Sandefjord, Norway
Oslo, Norway

Website

Pricing

Free version ❌
Custom
Free version ✔️Open source
SaaS
Free version ✔️5 GB storage
Professional€1,000+
EnterpriseCustom

Categories

CMS › Rank #129
CMS › Rank #117

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Enonic CMS is 1.2 times more popular than CorePublish.
Total websites

Market share

CMS

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Enonic is more popular in Sweden, the Netherlands, and Finland, while CorePublish is more popular in Norway and American Samoa.
Norway
Sweden
Netherlands
Finland
Denmark
American Samoa
United Kingdom
Germany
Kyrgyzstan
Luxembourg

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Enonic is more popular among sites focused on sports, government and military, and public information, while CorePublish is more commonly used on business and non-profit, advocacy and NGO sites.
Business
Sports
Government/Military
Public Information
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Internet Services
Health
Travel
Entertainment
Politics/Opinion

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#76,181
#79,846
#132,652
#143,913
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#17,395
#18,876
postcodeloterij.nl
#25,240
vriendenloterij.nl
#25,501
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.