🆚 CSS vs. RDF
- 📈 CSS is much more popular than RDF.
- 🌍 CSS is more popular in all countries.
CSSType
About
Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) is a stylesheet language used to control the presentation of 
HTML and 
XML documents, defining layout, colors, typography, and responsive behavior across different devices.
It uses a cascading and specificity model to resolve style conflicts, supports reusable rules and selectors, and includes layout systems such as Flexbox and Grid, media queries for responsive design, and features for animations, transformations, and advanced text formatting.
Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a W3C standard model for describing and exchanging graph-based data on the web.
It enables linking and integration of data across different vocabularies, represents information as subject-predicate-object triples forming directed graphs, and supports serialization formats such as RDF/XML for XML-based data exchange as well as Turtle and 
JSON-LD.
Headquarters
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Standards category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Standards category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Standards category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Standards category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Russia in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in Ukraine in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in Russia in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in Pakistan in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in Indonesia in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 25th most popular in South Africa in the Standards category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
YAML
Sass
XFN
OpenSearch🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,511,995 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.