🆚 Cufon vs. XRegExp
- 📈 Cufon is much more popular than XRegExp.
- 🌎 Cufon is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 XRegExp is more popular in Belgium.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Cufon
XRegExpType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Cufon is a discontinued 
JavaScript library that performs text replacement on web pages, using the canvas element and VML to render fancy fonts.
XRegExp provides augmented and extensible JavaScript regular expressions.
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Cufon JavaScript library is 14 times more popular than XRegExp.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Cufon is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, while XRegExp is more popular in Belgium.
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
Russia
Italy
Poland
Spain
France
India
Netherlands
Awards
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in Russia in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 25th most popular in Poland in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 26th most popular in Turkey in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 26th most popular in the Czech Republic in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 28th most popular in Ukraine in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 258th most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Cufon is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and blogs and wiki, while XRegExp is more commonly used on motor vehicles sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Travel
Health
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,001,723 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.