🆚 Morphext vs. XRegExp
- 📈 Morphext is much more popular than XRegExp.
- 🌍 Morphext is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
XRegExpType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
A simple, high-performance and cross-browser 
jQuery rotating / carousel plugin for text phrases powered by Animate.css.
XRegExp provides augmented and extensible 
JavaScript regular expressions.
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Morphext JavaScript library is 18 times more popular than XRegExp.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Morphext is more popular than XRegExp in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
France
India
Spain
Australia
Canada
Italy
Netherlands
Awards
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Chile in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Argentina in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in South Africa in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Singapore in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Malaysia in the Animation category.
- ⬆️ 174th most popular in Belgium in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 228th most popular in France in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 252nd most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Morphext is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and education and reference, while XRegExp is more commonly used on technical, business forums sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Online Shopping
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Health
Travel
Software/Hardware
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Animsition
CKEditor
TinyMCE
Mustache.js🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.