🆚 FitText vs. XRegExp
- 📈 FitText is much more popular than XRegExp.
- 🌍 FitText is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
XRegExpType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
FitText is a 
jQuery flexible font plugin that allows elements to fill the width of their parent elements.
XRegExp provides augmented and extensible 
JavaScript regular expressions.
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #118
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #262
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The FitText JavaScript library is 26 times more popular than XRegExp.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
FitText is more popular than XRegExp in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Japan
Italy
Netherlands
France
Spain
Canada
Australia
Awards
- ⬆️ 92nd most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 94th most popular in Sweden in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 98th most popular in Slovakia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 99th most popular in the Czech Republic in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 99th most popular in Hungary in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 174th most popular in Belgium in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 228th most popular in France in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 252nd most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
FitText is more popular than XRegExp in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Entertainment
Travel
Online Shopping
Sports
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
CKEditor
TinyMCE
Mustache.js🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.