🆚 Dart vs. Erlang
- 📈 Erlang is three times more popular than Dart.
- 🌎 Erlang is more popular in the United States, Brazil, and Germany.
- 🌍 Dart is more popular in India, Singapore, and Korea.
Dart
ErlangType
About
Dart is an object-oriented, class-based, garbage-collected programming language developed by Google for building cross-platform applications from a single codebase.
It supports both ahead-of-time and just-in-time compilation, asynchronous programming, enforces null safety, provides a package ecosystem with thousands of packages, and compiles to native machine code, 
JavaScript, or WebAssembly.
Erlang is a high-level functional programming language designed for building concurrent, distributed, and fault-tolerant systems.
It provides lightweight processes with isolated memory and asynchronous message passing, supports hot code swapping without downtime, and includes the Erlang/OTP platform with supervision trees, reusable behaviors, and a standard library for scalable applications.
Headquarters
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 11st most popular in Brazil in the Programming Languages category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in the United States in the Programming Languages category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in Germany in the Programming Languages category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
C#
Lua
Java
Scala
CFML
Elixir
Haskell
Google company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.